to the dispute on Unicoop unilateral decision to move its employees from the afternoon shift to morning shift in favor of external contracts for the establishment of violation of Article .89 of the national labor contract.
Florence, 21/4/2005
to the Provincial Directorate of Labour Inspection Staff
Florence Avenue
Lavagnini No 9 50123 Florence
signaling art. 7 letter. b) Legislative Decree no. April 23, 2004 No 124
With this Mr. Taddeo Albanian, not really, but as Secretary of the Provincial Judicial UGL, AZ and gentlemen, SR and GR, employees Unicoop Florence, at the warehouse location Pratoni, Grenadiers - V.le Europe, 51, Scandicci (FI)
reports and complaints to the inspection staff at the Provincial
1. On November 28, 2004
2. Until then, the department store various kinds, sausages and dairy products had been divided into three shifts: the morning, the afternoon and night.
On the basis of a union agreement in 2001, the night shift was not given to employees Unicoop, but a company outside the
3. In its communication of 28.11.2004
4. In this regard, Dec. 2, 2004 is convened an assembly in which it is exposed to the restructuring program, and stated that the company intends to outsource all the work on the logistics.
All for a cost problem.
5. On December 15, 2004
6. At the end of December 2004 the
7. Contrary to what was said earlier, the Unicoop
8. No more calling the RSU
9. On January 28, AC is delivered by hand (some sent by telegram) to each worker the new working time in force by next Monday, January 31.
These are the facts.
the applicable collective agreement Unicoop from Florence, but, unlike other contracts, and notwithstanding the law generally requires that the change of working is established only after a company agreement.
Here is the full text article. 89 CCNL 1999/2004
"1. The distribution of working hours will be agreed at the company, according to the provisions of art. 14, in order to achieve in its articulation and taking into account the opening hours, the following objectives: ... "
The company has unilaterally changed working hours, without" agreeing "with anything
Quest
said this instance is made to the local Labour because through the inspection staff referred to in art. 6 D . Legislative Decree No 124 of 23.4.2004, establish the facts mentioned above and, therefore, take all measures it considers necessary, in particular with regard to violations of Article. 7 letter. b) Legislative Decree no. 23.4 .2004 No 124. Attached
1. Draft agreement of 16.7.2001
2. RSU's response to the request to reform the organization
3. Convocation of the General Assembly for 23/12/2004 (not held then following the statement by the company did not wish to proceed with the reform of working time)
4. Notice of the new RSU shifts
5. telegram time change
6. Document approved by the warehouse, 5.2.2005
7. Negotiable extract
8. legal opinion of Prof. Fanfani
UGL-UTL Florence Taddeo
Albanian
AZ
RS
GR
0 comments:
Post a Comment